1. Open Access
1.1. continuous transformation of the university journals to OA
1.2. transformation agreement on national level
1.2.1. from read to read & publish
1.2.1.1. vouchers / tokens
1.2.1.1.1. UPOL = methods of efficient distribution
2. huge metadata repository (OBD) of scientific publications (everything with approx. last 20 years)
2.1. from 2020 OS functions as well
2.1.1. OA meta-fieds
2.1.2. links to research data
2.1.3. options to submit fulltexts
2.2. ORCIDs of all active authors
2.3. its NOT the publication repository by design
2.3.1. building DSpace as broker from OBD to OpenAIRE and other infrastructure
2.4. reporting metadata to the national information system
2.4.1. isvavai.cz
3. fundings
3.1. internal = insufficent funds at the central offices = missing opportunities to e.g.
3.1.1. staff reinforcement
3.1.2. faculty OS coordinators & stewards
3.1.3. central R&D office = multiple agenda (data analysis, reporting, evidence, bibliometric, OS, research strategy questions, asessment etc)
3.1.4. power-up for internal tools development
3.1.5. rewards ofc
3.2. 2021-2027 EU Operational Programmes
3.2.1. 2023 OP JaK Open Science I
3.2.1.1. building infrastructure
3.2.1.1.1. mainly for EOSC implementation on natinal level
3.2.1.1.2. National Repository Platform
3.2.2. 2024 OP JaK Open Science II
3.2.2.1. field-specific tenants for NRP
3.2.3. 2025 OP JaK Open Science III
3.2.3.1. human resources
3.2.3.1.1. training
3.2.3.1.2. data stewards
3.2.4. 2023 OP JaK Leading-edge research
3.2.4.1. OS as the means of implementation not the subject
3.3. Aurora?
3.3.1. new grant opportunities?
4. 2023 = Open Science strategy and FAIR data policy
4.1. detailed strategy for upcoming years
4.1.1. for the management from the strategists
4.2. 2023 = Data Policy university manifest
4.2.1. management & community collaboration
4.2.2. rules only where have to be; guidance anywhere else
4.2.3. best practices handbook
5. ORCID consortium
5.1. national level
5.2. managed profiles via API
5.2.1. affiliation
5.2.2. publications metadata
5.3. from April 2023
6. initiative structure
6.1. top-down
6.1.1. university management = sponsor & supervisor
6.1.1.1. acknowledgement of the importance
6.1.2. R&D office = strategy & implementation
6.1.2.1. + OS WG of enthusiats
6.1.3. university library = popularization & education
6.1.4. Aurora office = partnership & networking
6.2. bottom-up
6.2.1. OS community
6.2.1.1. internal
6.2.1.1.1. WP6 incubator
6.2.1.1.2. opinion (research) leaders
6.2.1.1.3. researchers
6.2.1.2. external
6.2.1.2.1. Aurora partners
6.2.1.2.2. Czech groups
6.2.1.2.3. potentially foreign universities
7. intellectual rights matters
7.1. internal industrial property rights policy = done
7.1.1. legislature
7.1.2. transfer to commerce
7.1.3. processes
7.2. internal copyright policy = finalizing
7.2.1. brand new internal standard
7.2.2. reporting obligations
7.2.3. responsibilities
7.2.4. Open Access
7.2.4.1. concluding licences on publications
7.2.4.2. article processing charges in bookkeeping records
7.2.5. TBD handbook with interpretation, examples and good practice
8. research data management (RDM) internal survey
8.1. approx. four month of preparations
8.2. it will run till 21st November
8.3. 40 carefully selected questions
8.3.1. knowledge on OS and RDM tools
8.3.2. experience so far
8.3.3. discipline-specific practices
8.3.4. opinions, obstacles
8.4. emphasis on public sharing of data
8.5. goal = to map current practice across specific fields of research
8.6. fundamental basis for new data policy
8.7. respondents picked by faculties management
8.7.1. group leaders
8.7.2. lab. / dept. heads
8.7.3. others with responisibilities
8.7.4. NOT everyone
8.8. english version could be shared to the partners
8.8.1. comparing results?
8.8.2. included in common knowledge base (WP6 goal)?
9. data management planning (DMP)
9.1. Data Stewardship Wizard = institutional tool for DMP
9.1.1. Elixir CZ partners
9.1.1.1. btw RDMkit
9.1.2. https://aurora.ds-wizard.org/dashboard
9.1.3. Horizon Europe templates
9.2. handbook
9.2.1. inside RDMkit? TBD
9.3. DMP = obligatory (at the end) DWS = recommended with support other tools = free to use
9.3.1. TBD
9.3.1.1. templates for internal grants
9.3.1.1.1. learning on the small ones
9.3.1.2. popularization with the emphasis on motivation